13,268 research outputs found
The evolution of carrying capacity in constrained and expanding tumour cell populations
Cancer cells are known to modify their micro-environment such that it can
sustain a larger population, or, in ecological terms, they construct a niche
which increases the carrying capacity of the population. It has however been
argued that niche construction, which benefits all cells in the tumour, would
be selected against since cheaters could reap the benefits without paying the
cost. We have investigated the impact of niche specificity on tumour evolution
using an individual based model of breast tumour growth, in which the carrying
capacity of each cell consists of two components: an intrinsic,
subclone-specific part and a contribution from all neighbouring cells. Analysis
of the model shows that the ability of a mutant to invade a resident population
depends strongly on the specificity. When specificity is low selection is
mostly on growth rate, while high specificity shifts selection towards
increased carrying capacity. Further, we show that the long-term evolution of
the system can be predicted using adaptive dynamics. By comparing the results
from a spatially structured vs.\ well-mixed population we show that spatial
structure restores selection for carrying capacity even at zero specificity,
which a poses solution to the niche construction dilemma. Lastly, we show that
an expanding population exhibits spatially variable selection pressure, where
cells at the leading edge exhibit higher growth rate and lower carrying
capacity than those at the centre of the tumour.Comment: Major revisions compared to previous version. The paper is now aimed
at tumour modelling. We now start out with an agent-based model for which we
derive a mean-field ODE-model. The ODE-model is further analysed using the
theory of adaptive dynamic
Exploiting evolution to treat drug resistance: Combination therapy and the double bind
Although many anti cancer therapies are successful in killing a large percentage of tumour cells when initially administered, the evolutionary dynamics underpinning tumour progression mean that often resistance is an inevitable outcome, allowing for new tumour phenotypes to emerge that are unhindered by the therapy. Research in the field of ecology suggests that an evolutionary double bind could be an effective way to treat tumours. In an evolutionary double bind two therapies are used in combination such that evolving resistance to one leaves individuals more susceptible to the other. In this paper we present a general evolutionary game theory model of a double bind to study the effect that such approach would have in cancer. Furthermore we use this mathematical framework to understand recent experimental results that suggest a synergistic effect between a p53 cancer vaccine and chemotherapy. Our model recapitulates the experimental data and provides an explanation for its effectiveness based on the commensalistic relationship between the tumour phenotypes
The impact of cellular characteristics on the evolution of shape homeostasis
The importance of individual cells in a developing multicellular organism is
well known but precisely how the individual cellular characteristics of those
cells collectively drive the emergence of robust, homeostatic structures is
less well understood. For example cell communication via a diffusible factor
allows for information to travel across large distances within the population,
and cell polarisation makes it possible to form structures with a particular
orientation, but how do these processes interact to produce a more robust and
regulated structure? In this study we investigate the ability of cells with
different cellular characteristics to grow and maintain homeostatic structures.
We do this in the context of an individual-based model where cell behaviour is
driven by an intra-cellular network that determines the cell phenotype. More
precisely, we investigated evolution with 96 different permutations of our
model, where cell motility, cell death, long-range growth factor (LGF),
short-range growth factor (SGF) and cell polarisation were either present or
absent. The results show that LGF has the largest positive impact on the
fitness of the evolved solutions. SGF and polarisation also contribute, but all
other capabilities essentially increase the search space, effectively making it
more difficult to achieve a solution. By perturbing the evolved solutions, we
found that they are highly robust to both mutations and wounding. In addition,
we observed that by evolving solutions in more unstable environments they
produce structures that were more robust and adaptive. In conclusion, our
results suggest that robust collective behaviour is most likely to evolve when
cells are endowed with long range communication, cell polarisation, and
selection pressure from an unstable environment
Bridging scales in cancer progression: Mapping genotype to phenotype using neural networks
In this review we summarize our recent efforts in trying to understand the
role of heterogeneity in cancer progression by using neural networks to
characterise different aspects of the mapping from a cancer cells genotype and
environment to its phenotype. Our central premise is that cancer is an evolving
system subject to mutation and selection, and the primary conduit for these
processes to occur is the cancer cell whose behaviour is regulated on multiple
biological scales. The selection pressure is mainly driven by the
microenvironment that the tumour is growing in and this acts directly upon the
cell phenotype. In turn, the phenotype is driven by the intracellular pathways
that are regulated by the genotype. Integrating all of these processes is a
massive undertaking and requires bridging many biological scales (i.e.
genotype, pathway, phenotype and environment) that we will only scratch the
surface of in this review. We will focus on models that use neural networks as
a means of connecting these different biological scales, since they allow us to
easily create heterogeneity for selection to act upon and importantly this
heterogeneity can be implemented at different biological scales. More
specifically, we consider three different neural networks that bridge different
aspects of these scales and the dialogue with the micro-environment, (i) the
impact of the micro-environment on evolutionary dynamics, (ii) the mapping from
genotype to phenotype under drug-induced perturbations and (iii) pathway
activity in both normal and cancer cells under different micro-environmental
conditions
Computational Methods and Results for Structured Multiscale Models of Tumor Invasion
We present multiscale models of cancer tumor invasion with components at the
molecular, cellular, and tissue levels. We provide biological justifications
for the model components, present computational results from the model, and
discuss the scientific-computing methodology used to solve the model equations.
The models and methodology presented in this paper form the basis for
developing and treating increasingly complex, mechanistic models of tumor
invasion that will be more predictive and less phenomenological. Because many
of the features of the cancer models, such as taxis, aging and growth, are seen
in other biological systems, the models and methods discussed here also provide
a template for handling a broader range of biological problems
A mathematical model of tumor self-seeding reveals secondary metastatic deposits as drivers of primary tumor growth
Two models of circulating tumor cell (CTC) dynamics have been proposed to
explain the phenomenon of tumor 'self-seeding', whereby CTCs repopulate the
primary tumor and accelerate growth: Primary Seeding, where cells from a
primary tumor shed into the vasculature and return back to the primary
themselves; and Secondary Seeding, where cells from the primary first
metastasize in a secondary tissue and form microscopic secondary deposits,
which then shed cells into the vasculature returning to the primary. These two
models are difficult to distinguish experimentally, yet the differences between
them is of great importance to both our understanding of the metastatic process
and also for designing methods of intervention. Therefore we developed a
mathematical model to test the relative likelihood of these two phenomena in
the subset of tumours whose shed CTCs first encounter the lung capillary bed,
and show that Secondary Seeding is several orders of magnitude more likely than
Primary seeding. We suggest how this difference could affect tumour evolution,
progression and therapy, and propose several possible methods of experimental
validation.Comment: 20 pages, 4 figure
- …